Investing is a difficult profession. Sometimes when you are right, you are still wrong. Other times you get lucky. I mentioned the former point in my Twitter article. I was exactly right about Periscope, but it didn't matter to the stock. The reason why it doesn't matter is investors are scared. Investors in public companies do not like seeing change in the business model. This is because Twitter is not actually planning to have its main website lose popularity and be replaced by Periscope . The fact that Twitter isn't warning investors about this change frightens them because it makes it look like Twitter is out of control. I will consider buying Twitter stock again after the recession. At that point Periscope will be a top app in the App Store. This will lower the risk that it falls off. Periscope will center the next revolution in social media as web-stars will use it to connect to their audience in a more personal way. If I would have bought Periscope without owning Twitter, I would be up on my investment. As you can see in the chart below, my prediction that the app would have a bounce back after a temporary loss in popularity in December was correct. This has had zero effect on Twitter's stock. I wonder if a positive announcement on usage on the conference call in a few weeks has any effect on the stock. I think Periscope avoided updating its usage because of the decline in December. If it updated us in January with results ending in December, the chart would be going down at the end. Now that it has improved, in can give us positive results when it next updates. I'm anxiously awaiting the next major update of the app which I will cover on Seeking Alpha.